The term was taken from Michael Schrage's article on the Harvard Business Review Blog network (something else I learned about), The Future of Lie Detection in the Workplace.
Because Schrage is a research fellow at MIT, some of what he says is even too much jargon for me:
but I think I get the general idea.But the real revolution emerging is not the greater transparency of a LinkedIn here and the statistical significance of a "lie detection" algorithm there; it's their linkage, fusion and aggregation. Verification is becoming multimodal. Multimodal verification assures greater personal veracity. In other words, networking these technologies creates a rising deterrent to dishonesty. The odds dramatically increase that deceivers will be tripped up by their misrepresentations and mannerisms.
More importantly, I think the bigger point is that it seems as if more and more of our fellow Americans are willing to bend the truth on things big as well as small.
Whether or not we can develop technology to cope with it is an interesting question, but the reasons why more people are willing to not tell the truth, if in fact that is correct, is an even more important question, one that causes for more soul searching.
Which reminds me that on my summer reading list was James B. Stewart's, Tangled Webs: How False Statements are Undermining America: From Martha Stewart to Bernie Madoff.
Not much time left in the summer.